Opinion

Did the US lose the battle-of- hearts and minds in the Middle East after the horrific hospital bombing in Gaza?

Atul Aneja

It is rare to see Arab leaders in unison snubbing a US President on a visit to the heart of the Middle East.

But that just happened on Tuesday when the Jordan’s King Abdullah, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi and Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas refused to meet visiting US President, Joe Biden. The three, each with leverages to impact the festering Gaza crisis, stayed away from a collective meeting in Jordan’s famous capital Amman. The reason—a horrific attack on the Al-Ahli hospital. Nearly 500, including a large number of women and children, were killed in the cruel, and possibly, a tide turning strike.

The bombing triggered a Tsunami of opinion in the Arab Street against Israel and the United States, the guarantor of Tel Aviv’s security. In popular perception, Israel had ordered the attack, drowning out Tel Aviv’s riposte that it was not its forces, but the militant pro-Iran Islamic Jihad that had launched the missile, which had misfired. And when Biden blundered by saying that it appeared that not Israel but the “other team” had perpetrated the gut-wrenching crime, it was game-over for America among billions residing across the globe, who had been sickened by the hospital attack.

Unsurprisingly, not one Arab nation, including US allies—the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Morocco or Bahrain—caveated a response that would sow doubts about Israel’s culpability.

The UAE and Bahrain, which both established ties with Israel nested under the 2020 Abraham Accords, condemned the “Israeli” attack, which took place at a time when Tel Aviv had besieged Gaza.

The heart-rendering consternation was triggered last Saturday by Hamas cadres when they invaded Israeli settlements near Gaza. The attackers killed nearly 1500 Israelis, a shocking statistic in a country which prides itself as a security state. An estimated 150 were kidnapped and turned hostage in embattled Gaza. Many Americans and others with dual-nationality were also taken captive.

However, the balance of perceptions seemed to have turned in favour of the Palestinians in the aftermath of the deadly hospital bombing and the resultant carnage.

“The United Arab Emirates strongly condemns the Israeli attack… resulting in the death and injury of hundreds of people,” the UAE’s official WAM news agency said early on Wednesday.

Bahrain’s foreign ministry also “expressed the Kingdom of Bahrain’s condemnation and strong denunciation of the Israeli bombing”, the Bahrain News Agency said.

Morocco, a north African state that recognised Israel, also blamed Israel for the strike. So did Egypt, the regional heavyweight that borders Gaza, and whose role would be critical in pumping humanitarian supplies to the coastal strip.

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi strongly condemned “the Israeli bombing” of the Ahli Arab hospital, which killed “hundreds of innocent victims” in Gaza.

He called the “deliberate bombing” a “clear violation of international law”.

Saudi Arabia, too labelled the blast as a “heinous crime committed by the Israeli occupation forces”.

Jordan, which borders Israel said that the Jewish state “bears responsibility for this grave incident”.  The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), slammed Israel for perpetrating “a war crime, a crime against humanity, and organised state terrorism”.

While President Biden was firefighting at ground-zero in Israel, in faraway Beijing, where he had participated in the BRI forum, Russian President Vladimir Putin was ahead–talking about permanently ending the Israel-Palestine conflict, with the Gaza hospital bombing in the background.

“As for the attack on the hospital, the tragedy that occurred there, it is a terrible event, hundreds of dead, hundreds of wounded. This is, of course, a catastrophe,” Putin told reporters in Beijing after attending the third Belt and Road Forum and meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

He said that he expected that the bombing would be a signal to “end the conflict as soon as possible” and begin “some contacts and negotiations.”

Putin stressed that Russia had always favoured an independent Palestinian state with its capital in East Jerusalem.

The appearance of an independent Palestine on the map will set the conditions for “a lasting peace”—a position that stood tall amid the kinetics of anger, vendetta and tragedy.

Also Read: Has Biden launched ‘mission impossible’ during his visit to Israel in the thick of war?

 

Atul Aneja

Atul Aneja writes on international geopolitical trends focusing on China, Eurasia and the Indo-Pacific

Recent Posts

“Buddhism shows world how to counter sectarianism”: President Droupadi Murmu at Asian Buddhist Summit

President Droupadi Murmu graced the first Asian Buddhist Summit, organised by the Ministry of Culture,…

34 mins ago

Pakistan: Teachers agitate over non-payment of salaries for eight months

The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government has failed to pay the salaries to teachers of non-formal girls'…

41 mins ago

“Whatever the verdict, our relationship with US will only grow”: EAM Jaishankr on US Presidential Elections

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar held a joint presser with his Australian Counterpart Penny Wong,…

3 hours ago

‘Political space given to extremist forces’: EAM Jaishankar on attacks on Hindu temples in Canada

External Affairs Minister, S Jaishankar expressed concerns about the recent attacks on the Hindu temples…

4 hours ago

Coast Guard Chief S Paramesh calls on Navy Chief Admiral, deliberates on ICG’s operational readiness

Indian Coast Guard Chief Director General S Paramesh has called on Indian Navy Chief Admiral…

4 hours ago

North Korea launches short-range ballistic missiles ahead of US elections

Just a few hours ahead of the presidential polls in the United States, North Korea…

5 hours ago